Analyst: Publishers Seeing Steady Print Declines Should Ready for Steep Drop
Publishers are more optimistic that they won’t see “significant” drops in print revenue in 2012, according to a recent survey. That optimism may be misplaced.
While print publishing revenues showed a steady decline across the industry in 2011, publishers should ready themselves for a steep drop in 2012 or 2013, according to a Forrester analyst.
In a Digital Book World survey conducted by Forrester Research, 5% of publishers believe their print sales will “decrease significantly” in 2012 versus 12% who thought the same about 2011 when asked in 2010. The percentage of publishers who predicted any print declines in 2012 was virtually unchanged versus the previous year.
“There’s an optimism about the pessimism,” said James L. McQuivey, Ph.D., vice president and principal analyst at Forrester, who conducted the survey. “But in reality the decline hasn’t hit yet. And when it does, it comes in big drops, not gradual tapers – that’s what we learned from music and DVD, both of which tapered down until they hit big drops and shelf-space disappeared rapidly. The same will happen in books, probably by late this year and certainly in 2013.”
In late 2011, book publishers representing 74% of U.S. publishing revenues were surveyed on a wide range of topics concerning digital books. The same survey was conducted in 2010.
According to the Association of American Publishers, print revenue in the two largest publishing segments for which it tracks monthly book sales numbers was down 17.5% and 15.6%, respectively.
(E-book revenue overall was up 117%. E-book revenue’s increase of about half-a-billion dollars just about matched decreases in the adult hardcover and adult paperback segments, the two largest at $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.)
At several major book publishing companies, including Penguin and Simon & Schuster, increases in digital revenues accounted for declines in print revenues. But, because of higher profit margins on e-book revenues versus print-book revenues, profits were up even though sales were flat.
For some, less-diversified publishers, a precipitous decline in print due to rapid drops in shelf space could be disastrous.
“For those people – illustrated books, cookbooks – if print goes down, they go out,” said Thad McIlroy, a Vancouver-based digital publishing consultant.
On the even more “pessimistic” side of pessimism, fewer publishers believe they will see “significant” gains in print in 2012 than did in last year’s version of the survey: 2% versus 9%.
“There is always a segment that can expect to grow,” said McQuivey. “But these successes will be modest and may not represent an opportunity worth investing in because they won’t last.”
As I wrote with the original post:
ReplyDeleteA small clarification:
My comment was made specifically with respect to IPG, noting that (a) less than 15% of the titles represented by IPG have been digitized and (b) the reason in many cases is because the books are heavily illustrated works ill-suited to conversion to the most common ebook formats in use today.
But I also see that there are many text-only titles that have yet to be converted, and this puzzles me. For these books in particular, keeping them print-only is a great disservice to the author — an increasing number of sales opportunities are missed.
On the other hand, smaller publishers often feature the bandwidth to get the word out online with more energy and attention-to-detail than larger publishers. I think there are lots of online opportunities to extend the audience also for print titles. Start with getting accurate and complete metadata in place, and onward from there.
Thad McIlroy